The introduction provides context for the study, outlining the significance of digital inclusion for senior citizens within the Arkhangelsk region and its surrounding municipalities. It establishes the scope by clearly articulating the geographical boundaries and demographic focus: older adults. Furthermore, the introductory section will highlight the research's objectives, which include identifying the specific digital divide issues, evaluating technology uses, and finding out some strategies and future work. The introduction sets the stage for the subsequent sections by emphasizing the importance of digital literacy, access, and how this work will help to solve them.

This section reviews existing literature on digital inclusion among senior citizens, examining key concepts, barriers, and successful intervention strategies. The review will cover various aspects, including technological access, digital literacy, and the impact of digital inclusion on older adults' quality of life. The section will analyze studies on access to devices, internet connectivity, and the influence of socioeconomic factors on digital participation. Furthermore, we will delve into the impact of digital exclusion on healthcare, social interaction, and access to essential services, highlighting best practices and gaps in existing research, particularly those related to the Arkhangelsk region specifically. It will include information about international projects.

The methodology section details the research design, including the mixed-methods approach utilized to gather comprehensive data, involving a combination of quantitative and qualitative data. It describes the data collection methods, such as surveys with a representative sample of senior citizens, designed to gather quantitative data about digital access, skills, and usage patterns. Additionally, we use interviews and focus groups with elderly citizens and stakeholders (local authorities and technology providers) to collect qualitative data and enrich understanding of insights and perspectives regarding digital inclusion. The section describes the ethical considerations and data analysis techniques, establishing the rigor and transparency of the research process.

This section evaluates the availability and accessibility of digital infrastructure in the Arkhangelsk region and its surrounding municipalities. The evaluation involves an assessment of internet access, examining broadband coverage, speed, and cost, considering the geographical dispersion of the population and the availability of different types of devices. Also, the section will contain information about the availability of affordable devices, such as computers, tablets, and smartphones, and the affordability of internet services. The aim is to identify areas with limited access or high costs that hinder digital inclusion for senior citizens, and propose some appropriate solutions. The results will be visualized and analyzed.

This section explores the digital literacy levels of senior citizens, assessing their existing skills in using digital devices and online platforms. The evaluation involves various aspects, including device usage, online service navigation, and online safety practices: password management, identifying scams, and recognizing misinformation online. This part of the research will identify the skills gaps and barriers to digital literacy that limit the ability of senior citizens to fully participate in the digital world. The results are compared with regional and national benchmarks. This analysis will guide the development of targeted training and support to improve digital skills.

This section analyzes the impact of digital inclusion on the well-being of senior citizens in the specified regions, focusing on how technological access influences the quality of life. The assessment includes the analysis of improved access to healthcare services such as telemedicine, online consultations, and access to health information. We will evaluate how digital tools support social connections, including online communication with families and friends, and participation in online communities. It assesses the ability of digital technologies to facilitate access to information, educational resources, and leisure activities, thereby promoting independence and reducing isolation among senior citizens, using the collected data.

This section presents actionable recommendations and intervention strategies for promoting digital inclusion among senior citizens in Arkhangelsk and its neighboring municipalities. The set of recommendations focuses on enhancing digital access, through targeted programs to expand broadband coverage and making devices more affordable. It will focus on promoting digital literacy, and propose specific training programs tailored to different skill levels and needs, taking into account the common difficulties and suggestions. The recommendations include policy recommendations for local authorities, stakeholders and some ways of future cooperation. Each recommendation will be concrete and practical, to ensure the impact.

The conclusion summarizes the main findings of the research, highlighting the key challenges and opportunities for digital inclusion among senior citizens in Arkhangelsk and its adjacent municipalities. This section synthesizes the quantitative and qualitative data presented, emphasizing the importance of addressing the digital divide to improve the well-being and social integration of older adults. The conclusion will restate the main goals, and describe if they were achieved. It will also provide some areas for future research and make recommendations for the next steps to ensure the continuous development of policies and programs.

This section includes an exhaustive list of all the sources cited throughout the research, providing full bibliographic details for each reference. The format adheres to a consistent citation style, ensuring clarity and transparency. This includes academic journals, books, government reports, and relevant online resources, providing evidence-based support for the claims made in the report.. The list serves as a key resource for other people. The list supports the credibility of the research.